jakehasstandards:

Let me explain. I’m not a slacker. I started building a web-based version of Standards and switched to it toward the end of the week. I will introduce that system tonight at the Quantified Self meetup, and three weeks from right now on this blog.

Jake. I really, really, really want this tool. Please launch it? Sneak peak version?  :)

jakehasstandards:

Let me explain. I’m not a slacker. I started building a web-based version of Standards and switched to it toward the end of the week. I will introduce that system tonight at the Quantified Self meetup, and three weeks from right now on this blog.

Jake. I really, really, really want this tool. Please launch it? Sneak peak version?  :)

We improve what we measure

The following is cross-posted from my blog, as it’s relevant to a larger audience (how I use my blog) and is related to my standards project (something I write about here).

I’ve been thinking more about systems for success recently.

Adopting a framework is generally the best path to success. In building a successful startup, you can holy-war over what the framework should be (e.g. Viability, Feasibility, or Desirability), but at the end of the day any framework is better than no framework. Building a successful life is no different.

This thought is something I’ve discovered while I’ve been exploring a framework for personal success the past few months (standards project), and I’ve executed some experiments in quantifying my life:

  1. In Iceland I tracked a ton of personal stats about our trip, all food/drink we consumed, how many steps we walked, etc.
  2. I tried Facet of Life to track data through email.
  3. I added health goals to my standards project, to keep track of promised outcomes.
  4. I used dailyburn/iPhone to track sleep, caloric consumption, stress, weight, exercise and energy levels on a daily or more frequent basis.

I like these experiments, I also really like tracking things — it appeals to my inner data-geek[1]. I’m competitive, so I feel a need to improve what I measure; I now unconsciously optimize for: Diet, Energy, Sleep, Exercise. Yep, pretty good list.

Experiment #3 above taught me a bit about how to build a framework that utilizes my own nature to increase the likelihood of good outcomes.

I realized that my tracking can be difficult when I don’t have control of food preparation. Standardizing my intake around a core group of meals would greatly help me spend less time concentrated on tracking. So I just choose 6 meals and ordered enough food to make them for 2 weeks from safeway.com — this wasn’t a difficult decision, it was an efficient one. It also improved my health. My framework made it easy to make a limiting choice that was positive on my health.

Lesson learned for my standards project: I will focus more on frameworks that utilize a desire to be awesome + a desire to conserve attention to encourage efficient/scalable improvement.

[1] It also offends my sense of uniqueness, none of us like to feel like we’re robots, and I feel a certain elegance to living life unpredictably. But, at least for me, growing up is about accepting that choosing to put yourself in a routine isn’t the same as having a routine thrust upon you. Embracing chaos means remaining ever-vigilant, that’s hard. Choose routines that conserve energy, and use that energy for chosen moments of chaos embracing.

Next week, I’m divorcing my health goals from my standards project (this week, I’ve got 4 goals related to exercise and food), and replacing it only with the requirement that I track my efforts.

Standards should be light, a bare minimum of what you must do to excel.

jakehasstandards:

Let me explain. I’m not a slacker. I started building a web-based version of Standards and switched to it toward the end of the week. I will introduce that system tonight at the Quantified Self meetup, and three weeks from right now on this blog.

YES!
Crossing off the following to-do from my January calendar: — “Create multi-user online version of Standards”
I’m guess Jakob’s version is probably better than me hacking Google Spreadsheets or some similar tool.

jakehasstandards:

Let me explain. I’m not a slacker. I started building a web-based version of Standards and switched to it toward the end of the week. I will introduce that system tonight at the Quantified Self meetup, and three weeks from right now on this blog.

YES!

Crossing off the following to-do from my January calendar: — “Create multi-user online version of Standards”

I’m guess Jakob’s version is probably better than me hacking Google Spreadsheets or some similar tool.

The hardest part of being a god, is the ability to absolve yourself.

Thought to self, on my struggle adhering to my Standards project. Grandoise.

rahmin:

jakelodwick:

I killed it today. Only shortcomings were taking too long to warm up, and taking a nap after lunch. But I made up for the lost time during my cooldown block.
I feel pretty tired. I wonder what tomorrow will be like. It would be great if I could sustain this.
The best thing was locking lunch in stone. The result was two uninterrupted chunks of productive bliss. When lunchtime is mutable, it often gets delayed, causing a chain reaction of destabilizing events. And there’s weird psychological stuff… like if I’m very hungry, I seem to revert to a primitive mentality of “hungrily” working on whatever task I’m on at the moment, with a fixation that’s more about maintaining the intense state than ending it. I don’t know! It seems like the inner workings of one’s brain are so weird, so variable from person to person, sometimes it’s a wonder we can get anythingdone cooperatively.

it may look a little batshit nuts, but I think he’s on to something. 

Sign me up for batshit nuts. My standards project has really, really, helped me.

rahmin:

jakelodwick:

I killed it today. Only shortcomings were taking too long to warm up, and taking a nap after lunch. But I made up for the lost time during my cooldown block.

I feel pretty tired. I wonder what tomorrow will be like. It would be great if I could sustain this.

The best thing was locking lunch in stone. The result was two uninterrupted chunks of productive bliss. When lunchtime is mutable, it often gets delayed, causing a chain reaction of destabilizing events. And there’s weird psychological stuff… like if I’m very hungry, I seem to revert to a primitive mentality of “hungrily” working on whatever task I’m on at the moment, with a fixation that’s more about maintaining the intense state than ending it. I don’t know! It seems like the inner workings of one’s brain are so weird, so variable from person to person, sometimes it’s a wonder we can get anythingdone cooperatively.

it may look a little batshit nuts, but I think he’s on to something.

Sign me up for batshit nuts. My standards project has really, really, helped me.